Israel is not a place of compassioned neglect.
It would not be a private affair to offer a two state solution with a side by side Palestinian and Israeli state.
The best solution with all good hope for a better future is to embark on a Palestinian Protectorate. \
Israel should not be living side by side and within practically a state of people whose greatest hope is to defeat the Israeli State and send the solution back to pre 1948 armistices and agreements.
Israel can not live next to a new state that has the right to raise an army and issue war bonds.
This is not a solution and I think that our best hope is to make this a true world with equal rights, not equal dignity of war.
All in all, Israel must move along to the future and offer an independent governance without political ramifications to a people who are not in agreement on a total peace.
Thursday, March 21, 2013
Wednesday, March 20, 2013
What is the cost of a war
Winning above all costs dictates that resolve is an inscrutable concern.
Realizing that we do not win every war in the whole congruent way of life is a scary proposition for a new president to exceed his or her own formality of revised attrition in the eggshell of evolved success. Meaning a president must offer a good hope to the future at all times.
Mr. Bush was not considered by many today to have done that in the Iraq war of 2003.
Either way, the doctoral issues of human dignity are not the flavor of a fools proposition. Never exceeding your own name of independence is an assay of human integrity.
Withdrawn hope is never the outcome of a triumphant nation and thus I must conclude that the total Iraq war effort as played out was not a winning proposition in the outcome of our nations needs at the present day.
True Iraq may have had and most certainly could have had some weapons of mass destruction. Could they have continued to wage war against prosperity and dignity and human suffering? I think that is very possible. Either way, the lives and pain saved from perhaps an invasion of Iraq is not substantiated by the ongoing chagrin of many many people in the public arena.
Either you assuay the feelings of guilt and remorse and light up the sky with flares and bombs and remove the threat and think you did a good job, or you wait until the historical direction is ever more clear.
Realizing that we do not win every war in the whole congruent way of life is a scary proposition for a new president to exceed his or her own formality of revised attrition in the eggshell of evolved success. Meaning a president must offer a good hope to the future at all times.
Mr. Bush was not considered by many today to have done that in the Iraq war of 2003.
Either way, the doctoral issues of human dignity are not the flavor of a fools proposition. Never exceeding your own name of independence is an assay of human integrity.
Withdrawn hope is never the outcome of a triumphant nation and thus I must conclude that the total Iraq war effort as played out was not a winning proposition in the outcome of our nations needs at the present day.
True Iraq may have had and most certainly could have had some weapons of mass destruction. Could they have continued to wage war against prosperity and dignity and human suffering? I think that is very possible. Either way, the lives and pain saved from perhaps an invasion of Iraq is not substantiated by the ongoing chagrin of many many people in the public arena.
Either you assuay the feelings of guilt and remorse and light up the sky with flares and bombs and remove the threat and think you did a good job, or you wait until the historical direction is ever more clear.
Thursday, March 7, 2013
Why Jonathan Pollard is still in jail
Jonathan Pollard is in jail in the USA as a spy for Israel spying on America.
He has not been released despite an ongoing campaign of very frequent requests to pardon him from Mr. Obama as well as previous presidents. He is in his 27th year.
Despite his feeble status and less than optimal health, I suggest his reasons for incarceration at this length serve liberty.
He has no future as a citizen after breaking the common good of mankind between nations and I think that if he is freed, his nature is not going to serve the common good. Either way, I think he deserves his sentence and if they do release him, it will not bode well for the reality of international disputes.
He has not been released despite an ongoing campaign of very frequent requests to pardon him from Mr. Obama as well as previous presidents. He is in his 27th year.
Despite his feeble status and less than optimal health, I suggest his reasons for incarceration at this length serve liberty.
He has no future as a citizen after breaking the common good of mankind between nations and I think that if he is freed, his nature is not going to serve the common good. Either way, I think he deserves his sentence and if they do release him, it will not bode well for the reality of international disputes.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)